Intertextuality and the Understanding of the Qur’an from the Perspective of Reynolds

Document Type : Original Article

Authors

1 . Ph.D. in Quran and Hadith Sciences, Faculty of Theology and Islamic Studies, Shiraz University, Iran, “Corresponding Author”

2 . Associate Professor, Faculty of Theology and Islamic Studies, Shiraz University, Iran;

10.22034/jqopv.2024.9768

Abstract

Since the coining of the term “intertextuality” by Julia Kristeva, the concept has undergone various transformations. Some mistakenly consider it an extension of source criticism, while others, such as Gérard Genette, have sought to expand and refine its meaning. In recent years, the intertextual approach has increasingly found its way into the field of Qur’anic exegesis. Among the prominent figures in this area is Gabriel Reynolds, who has proposed the use of biblical subtexts as a means to better understand the Qur’an. This study, using a descriptive-analytical method, first explains and elaborates on the types of intertextuality and their application in Qur’anic exegesis, and then specifically examines Gabriel Reynolds’ theory regarding the intertextual relationship between the Qur’an and the Bible. The results indicate that, contrary to some assumptions, Reynolds does not seek to prove that the Qur’an borrows from sacred texts. Rather, his approach and use of the Bible for understanding the Qur’an align with implicit intertextuality as defined by Genette.

Keywords

References

  1. Qur'ān Karīm (The Holy Qur'ān).
  2. ʿAbbāspūr, Hūn, “Talmīḥ,” in Ḥasan Anūshah (ed.), Farhang-nāmah-yi Adabī Fārsī (Encyclopedia of Persian Literary Terms), Vol. 2, Tehran: Sāzmān-i Chāp wa Intishārāt, 1376 SH (1997 CE).
  3. Aḥmadī, Bābak, Sākhtār wa Ta’wīl-i Matn (Nishānah Shināsī wa Sākhtārgarā’ī) (Structure and Interpretation of the Text: Semiotics and Structuralism), Tehran: Nashr-i Markaz (Markaz Publishing), 1370 SH (1991 CE).
  4. Alkier, Stefan, “Intertextuality” in The New Cambridge Companion to Biblical Interpretation, Cambridge University Press, 2022, pp. 110 – 128.
  5. Allen, Graham, Baynāmatanīyyat (Intertextuality), Translated by Payām Yazdānjou, 2nd revised Edition, Tehran: Nashr-i Markaz (Markaz Publishing), 1385 SH (2006 CE).
  6. Āzar, Esmā’īl, Taḥlīlī bar Naẓariyyah-hā-yi Baynāmatanīyyat-i Jannatī (An Analysis of Genette’s Theories of Intertextuality), Pazhūhesh-hā-yi Naqd-i Adabī wa Sabk-shināsī (Research in Literary Criticism and Stylistics), No. 3, 1395 SH (2016 CE).
  7. Barthes, Roland, Bruissement du langage. Paris: Seuil, 1984.
  8. Barthes, Roland, L’Aventure sémiologique. Paris: Seuil. 1985.
  9. Barthes, Roland. Oeuvres completes. IV. 1972-1976. Paris.Seuil. 2002.
  10. Bressler, Charles, Daramadī bar Naẓariyyah-hā wa Rāh-hā-yi Naqd-i Adabī (An Introduction to Literary Theory and Methods of Criticism), Translated by Muṣṭafā ‘Ābidīnī-Fard, Edited by Ḥusayn Pāyandah, Tehran: Nīlūfar, 1393 SH (2014 CE).
  11. Brunel, Pierre, et al., Tārīkh-i Adabiyyāt-i Farānseh (History of French Literature), Translated by Nasrīn Khaṭṭāb and Mahwash Qavīmī, Tehran: SAMT (Iranian Organization for Research and Development of Humanities), 1387 SH (2008 CE).
  12. Eco, Umberto, A Theory of Semiotics, Bloomington, Indiana University Press.
  13. Genette, Gérard. La littérature au second degré. Paris: Seuil. 1997.
  14. Ghulām-Ḥusaynzādah, Gharīb-Riḍā, Ghulām-Pūr, Negār, Mīkhā’īl Bākhtīn (Mikhail Bakhtin), Tehran: Zarangār, 1387 SH (2008 CE).
  15. Ghulāmī, Sayyid Sajjād, et al., “Taḥlīl-i Rabṭ-i Baynāmatanī āyāt-i Taṭahīr bā ‘Umdaytari-ān Āyāt-i Imāmat, Wilāyat wa Faḍā’il-i Ahl-i Bayt” (Analysis of Intertextual Connection of the Verse of Purification with the Main Verses of Imamate, Guardianship, and the Virtues of the Ahl al-Bayt), Justārhā-yi Zabānī (Linguistic Essays), Vol. 8, No. 5, 1396 SH (2017 CE).
  16. Ghulāmī, Sayyid Sajjād, Rūḥī Barandq, Kāvus, Ḥājī Khānī, ‘Alī, “Taḥlīl-i Rabṭ-i Baynāmatanī āyāt-i Iṭā’ah bā ‘Umdaytari-ān Āyāt-i Imāmat, Wilāyat wa Faḍā’il-i Ahl-i Bayt” (Analysis of Intertextual Connection of the Verse of Obedience with the Main Verses of Imamate, Guardianship, and the Virtues of the Ahl al-Bayt), Taḥqīqāt-i ‘Ulūm-i Qur’ān wa Ḥadīth (Research in Qur’anic and Hadith Sciences), Vol. 15, No. 1, 1397 SH (2018 CE).
  17. Ibn Bābūyah, Moḥammad bin ‘Alī, ‘Uyūn Akhbār al-Riḍā (The Sources of the Reports about Imam al-Ridā), Beirut: Mu’assasah al-A’lamī lil-Maṭbū’āt (Al-A’lami Publishing House), 1404 AH (1984 CE).
  18. Ibn Bābūyah, Moḥammad bin ‘Alī, Tawḥīd (Oneness of God), Qom: Mu’assisah al-Nashr al-Islāmī bi-Jamā’at al-Mudarrisīn fī al-Ḥawzah al-’Ilmiyyah (Islamic Publishing Institute of the Society of Seminary Teachers), 1398 AH (1978 CE).
  19. Ja’farī, Fāṭimah, Al-Haddādī Dastjirdī, Zahrah, “Barrāsī-yi Mabānī-yi Baynāmatanīyyat-i Gérard Genette dar Rūmān-i Nowjavān ‘Aqrab-hā-yi Kashtī-yi Bambam’” (Analysis of Gérard Genette’s Intertextuality Principles in the Young Adult Novel ‘The Scorpions of the Bambam Ship’), Matn Pazhūhī-yi Adabī (Literary Text Studies), Vol. 25, No. 88, 1400 SH (2021 CE).
  20. Kristeva, J. Word, Dialogue and Novel. In L. S. Roudiez (Ed.), Desire in Language: A Semiotic Approach to Literature and Art (pp. 64-91). New York, NY: Colombia University Press. 1980.
  21. Ma’rifat, Moḥammad Hādī, Shubuhāt wa Rudūd ḥawla al-Qur’ān al-Karīm (Objections and Responses Regarding the Noble Qur’an), Qom: Mu’assisah al-Tamhīd, 1423 AH (2003 CE).
  22. Nādarī, Farhād, Nādarī, Samīyah, “Kārkard-i Naẓariyyah-yi ‘Trāmataniyyat’ Genette dar Kashf wa Wākāwī-yi Ta’thīr-pazīrī-yi Kūshnāmah az Shāhnāmah” (The Function of Genette’s ‘Transtextuality’ Theory in Discovering and Analyzing Kushnameh’s Influence from Shahnameh), Matn Shināsī-yi Adab-i Fārsī (Persian Literary Textual Studies), Vol. 10, No. 1, 1397 SH (2018 CE).
  23. Nāmawar Maṭlaq, Bahman, “Bākhtīn, Guftgumandī wa Chand-Ṣudā’ī: Mutāla’ah-yi Pīshābaynāmatanīyyat-i Bākhtīnī” (Bakhtin, Dialogism, and Polyphony: A Study of Bakhtinian Pre-Intertextuality), Pazhūhish-nāmah-yi ‘Ulūm-i Insānī (Humanities Research Journal), No. 57, 1387 SH (2008 CE).
  24. Nāmawar Maṭlaq, Bahman, “Trāmatnīyyat: Mutāla’ah-yi Ravābiṭ-i Yek Matn bā Matn-hā-yi Dīgar” (Intertextuality: A Study of the Relations between One Text and Other Texts), Pazhūhish-nāmah-yi ‘Ulūm-i Insānī (Humanities Research Journal), No. 56, 1386 SH (2007 CE).
  25. Nāmawar Maṭlaq, Bahman, Baynāmatanīyyat az Sākhtārgarā’ī tā Pāsā-Modernism (Intertextuality from Structuralism to Postmodernism), Tehran: Intishārāt-i Sukhan (Sukhan Press), 1395 SH (2016 CE).
  26. Nāmawar Maṭlaq, Bahman, Baynāmatanīyyat-hā (Intertextualities), Naqd-nāmah-yi Hunar (Art Critique Journal), Nashr-i Shahr, No. 2, 1389 SH (2010 CE).
  27. Nāmawar Maṭlaq, Bahman, Daramadī bar Baynāmatanīyyat, Naẓariyyah-hā wa Kārbardhā-yi ān (An Introduction to Intertextuality, Theories, and Applications), 2nd Edition, Tehran: Intishārāt-i Sukhan (Sukhan Press), 1394 SH (2015 CE).
  28. Neuwirth, A. “Einige Bemerkungen zum besonderen sprachlichen und literarischen Charakter des Koran.” Deutscher Orientalistentag 1975. Wiesbaden: Steiner, 1977, 736 – 9. Trans.: “Some remarks on the special linguistic and literary character of the Qur’an.”
  29. Nūbarī, ‘Alīrezā, Mīr-Murādī, Sayyid Samānah, “Taḥlīl-ī Enteqādī-yi Maqālah-yi Dūtā’ī-hā-yi Qur’ānī” (Critical Analysis of the Article on Qur’anic Dyads), Dufaslanāmah-yi ‘Ilmī Qur’ān-Pazhūhī Khāwar-shināsān (Biannual Scientific Journal of Qur’anic Studies of Orientalists), Vol. 17, No. 32, pp. 119–150, 1401 SH (2022 CE).
  30. Pāyandah, Ḥusayn, Gushūdan-i Rūmān: Rūmān-i Īrān dar Partaw-i Naẓariyyah wa Naqd-i Adabī (Opening the Novel: The Iranian Novel in Light of Literary Theory and Criticism), 3rd Edition, Tehran: Intishārāt-i Marwārīd (Marwārid Publishing), 1394 SH (2015 CE).
  31. Piegay-Gros, Nathalie, Introduction à l’intertextualité. Paris: Dunod. 1996.
  32. Qā’imī-Nīyā, ‘Alī, Biology of the Text (Biology-yi Naṣṣ), 2nd Edition, Tehran: Sāzmān-i Intishārāt-i Pizhūhishgāh-i Farhang wa Andīshah-yi Islāmī, 1393 SH (2014 CE).
  33. Rabau, Sophie, L’intertextualité. Paris: Flammarion.
  34. Reynolds, Gabriel Said, “Noah’s Lost Son in the Qurʾān”, Arabica, 64, 129-148, 2017.
  35. Reynolds, Gabriel Said, “Reading the Qur’an Through the Bible”. In First Things Journal. 2009.
  36. Reynolds, Gabriel Said, The Qur’an and its Biblical Subtext, Routledge, 2010.
  37. Sa’īdī, Mahdī, “Zabān-i Qaṣaṣ-i Qur’ān dar Andīshah-yi Ayatollah Jāvādī Āmulī bā Rūykard-i Enteqādī bih Nigarish-i Kārkardgarāyānī” (The Language of the Qur’anic Stories in the Thought of Ayatollah Jawadi Amuli with a Critical Approach to Functionalist Views), Motāla’āt-i Tafsīr-i Taptīqī (Comparative Exegesis Studies), Vol. 8, No. 1, 1402 SH (2023 CE).
  38. Ṣādiq Niyā, Mehrāb, Sulaymānī, Ḥusayn, Ṭabāṭabā’ī, Sayyid Moḥammad ‘Alī, “Barrāsī Tafsīr Āyāt-i Murtabiṭah bā Yahūdiyyah dar Al-Mīzān” (Analysis of the Interpretation of Verses Related to Judaism in Al-Mīzān), Motāla’āt-i Tafsīrī (Exegesis Studies), Vol. 4, No. 13, 1392 SH (2013 CE).
  39. Sāsānī, Farhād, “Ta’sīr-i Ravābiṭ-i Baynāmatanī dar Khuwānish-i Matn” (The Impact of Intertextual Relations in Reading the Text), Zabān wa Zabān-shināsī (Language and Linguistics), Vol. 1, No. 2, 1384 SH (2005 CE).
  40. Shafī’ī, Sa’īd, Motāla’āt-i Qur’ānī Mu’āṣirah dar Gharb (Contemporary Qur’anic Studies in the West), Tehran: Intishārāt-i Dāneshgāh-i Tehrān (University of Tehran Press), 1400 SH (2021 CE).
  41. Ṭabāṭabā’ī, Sayyid Moḥammad Ḥusayn, Al-Mīzān fī Tafsīr al-Qur’ān (Al-Mīzān: A Commentary on the Qur’an), Qom: Dāftari Intishārāt-i Islāmī, 1417 AH (1997 CE).
  42. Tanāfard, Sārah, Qāsim-Nejād, Zahra, “Naqd wa Arzyābī-yi Didgāh-i Gabriel Reynolds darbārah-yi Wiājah-yi ‘Rajīm’ dar Qur’ān” (Critique and Evaluation of Gabriel Reynolds’ View on the Word ‘Rajīm’ in the Qur’an), Qur’ān Pazhūhī-yi Khāwar-shināsān (Orientalists’ Qur’anic Studies), Vol. 18, No. 35, 1402 SH (2023 CE).
  43. Tanāfard, Sārah, Qāsim-Nejād, Zahra, Qur’ān-Pazhūhān wa Ḥadīth-Pazhūhān dar Gharb (Qur’anic and Hadith Scholars in the West), Isfahan: Farhangistān-i Andīshah (Academy of Thought), 1402 AH (2023 CE).
  44. Todorov, Tzvetan, Manṭiq-i Guftugū’ī-yi Mīkhā’īl Bākhtīn (The Dialogic Logic of Mikhail Bakhtin), Translated by Dāryūsh Karīmī, Tehran: Nashr-i Markaz (Markaz Publishing), 1377 SH (1998 CE).
  45. Volli, Ugo, Semiotik, Eine Einführung in ihre Grundbegriffe. Tubingen. A. Francke Verlag.
  46. Waṣafī, Moḥammad-Ridā, Shafī’ī, Sayyid Rūḥallāh, “Nigrishī Rūshmand bih Jāygah-i ‘Ahdīn dar Tafsīr-i Qur’ān bā Takīyah bar Al-gūlī-yi Nashānah-Shinākhtī Baynāmatanīyyat” (A Methodical View of the Role of the Old and New Testaments in Qur’anic Interpretation Based on the Semiotic Intertextuality Model), Taḥqīqāt-i ‘Ulūm-i Qur’ān wa Ḥadīth (Qur’anic and Hadith Sciences Research), Vol. 10, No. 2, 1392 SH (2013 CE).
  47. Webster, Roger, Pīsh-Daramadī bar Mutāla’ah-yi Naẓariyyah-yi Adabī (An Introduction to Literary Theory), Translated by Alahā Dahanvī, Tehran: Rūz-nigār (Ruznegar Publications), 1382 SH (2003 CE).
  48. Zarawānī, Mujtabā, ‘Ilmī, Qurbān, Sa’īdī, Moḥammad Bāqir, “Barrāsī wa Naqd-i Ārā-yi Gabriel Reynolds darbāb-i Kafālat-i Ḥaḍrat-i Maryam” (Review and Critique of Gabriel Reynolds’ Views on the Guardianship of Mary), Pazhūhesh-hā-yi Qur’ān wa Ḥadīth (Research in Quran and Hadith), Vol. 49, No. 2, 1395 SH (2016 CE)

Files

History

  • Receive Date: 10 June 2024
  • Revise Date: 10 August 2024
  • Accept Date: 06 November 2024

Share

How to cite

Statistics