1
Associate Professor of Al-Mustafa International University
2
Doctoral student of Quran and Hadith sciences
Abstract
The author claims that due to a mistake made at the time of writing Qur’an the term al-raqim in Surah Kahf verse 9 is incorrect, misreading and it is suggested to be al-ruqud. In order to prove his claim, the author seeks to benefit from methods of correcting manuscripts and evidence. By examining his claim and presumptions, the writer’s point of view is criticized; it is at least incorrect about the Qur’an and is essentially unfounded.
J Eskandarlou, M. and Miqdad Amiri, M. (2011). Criticism and Analysis of Commentary on Surah Kahf Verse 9 (titled Al-Ragim wa Al-Ragud). The Qur’an from Orientalists Point of View, 6(10), 97-126.
MLA
J Eskandarlou, M. , and Miqdad Amiri, M. . "Criticism and Analysis of Commentary on Surah Kahf Verse 9 (titled Al-Ragim wa Al-Ragud)", The Qur’an from Orientalists Point of View, 6, 10, 2011, 97-126.
HARVARD
J Eskandarlou, M., Miqdad Amiri, M. (2011). 'Criticism and Analysis of Commentary on Surah Kahf Verse 9 (titled Al-Ragim wa Al-Ragud)', The Qur’an from Orientalists Point of View, 6(10), pp. 97-126.
CHICAGO
M. J Eskandarlou and M. Miqdad Amiri, "Criticism and Analysis of Commentary on Surah Kahf Verse 9 (titled Al-Ragim wa Al-Ragud)," The Qur’an from Orientalists Point of View, 6 10 (2011): 97-126,
VANCOUVER
J Eskandarlou, M., Miqdad Amiri, M. Criticism and Analysis of Commentary on Surah Kahf Verse 9 (titled Al-Ragim wa Al-Ragud). The Qur’an from Orientalists Point of View, 2011; 6(10): 97-126.
)