Examination of the Structuring of Surah Ar-Rahman Using Michel Cuypers' Method

Document Type : Original Article

Authors

1 Faculty of Theology, Shiraz University, Shiraz, Iran

2 Shiraz, Shiraz University, Faculty of Theology, Department of Quran and Hadith Science

Abstract

The issue of the Qur’an’s structure and coherence has long been a topic of discussion among Qur’anic scholars and critics, with Islamic scholars proposing various approaches to elucidate it. Among the researchers who have advanced theories on this subject is Michel Cuypers, a Belgian scholar who seeks to demonstrate the Qur’an’s structural unity and interconnectedness by applying the principles of Semitic rhetoric.
This study employs analytical methods based on Cuypers’ approach to investigate the highly symmetrical structure of “the bride of the Qur’an,” Sūrat al-Raḥmān. The aim is to explore the distinctive organization of this sūrah through Cuypers’ method and to demonstrate the coherence between its verses and overall composition by mapping its elements to features of Semitic rhetoric, as well as to evaluate the effectiveness of this approach.
Following Cuypers’ model, the analysis first divides Sūrat al-Raḥmān into ten interconnected sections and then examines the relationships among them. The arrangement of the sūrah’s verses, according to Semitic rhetorical theory, forms a six-part parallel structure: initially presenting three thematic units, followed by three additional units that correspond through contrast, causality, and further contrast to the first three. Uncovering these links between seemingly distant segments not only reveals the sūrah’s unique organization but also contributes to a deeper understanding of the divine intent and the emergence of its layered meanings. 

Keywords

References

Quran Karim (The Noble Quran), Trans. Muḥammad-Mahdī Fūlādvand, Tehran: Dār al-Qurʾān al-Karīm, 1418 AH (1997 CE).
Abū Zahrah, Muḥammad, Al-Waḥdah al-Islāmiyyah (Islamic Unity), Cairo: Dār al-Fikr al-‘Arabī, n.d.
Adams, Charles J. Quran: the text and its history, in The Encyclopedia of Religion. 1987.
Aḥmadyārlū, Muḥammad Ḥusayn, Valavī, Sīmīn, and Bāqir, ‘Alī Reẓā, “Balāghat-i Sāmī wa Qawā‘id-i Naẓm-i Mutaqārin wa Naqd wa Barrasī-yi Ān dar Sūrah Ṣaff” (Semitic Rhetoric and Symmetrical Order: A Study of Sūrah Ṣaff), Qur’anic-Literary Researches, No. 4, pp. 26–63, 1400 SH (2021 CE).
Amānīpūr, Reẓā, “ʿUnṣur-i Takrār dar Qur’ān: Barrasī-yi ʿIlal-i Takrār-i Āyāt bā Maḥwārīyyat-i Sūrah al-Raḥmān” (Repetition as a Qur’anic Element: A Study of Repetition in Sūrah al-Raḥmān), Zulāl-i Waḥy, Nos. 15–16, pp. 38–39, 1388 SH (2009 CE).
Amīn, Sayyidah Nuṣrat, Makhzan al-‘Irfān fī Tafsīr al-Qur’ān (The Treasury of Gnosis in Qur’anic Interpretation), Isfahan: Gulbahār, 1389 SH (2010 CE).
ʿĀrūsī Ḥuwayzī, ʿAbd ʿAlī bin Jumuʿah, Tafsīr Nūr al-Thaqalayn (Exegesis of the Two Weights), Qom: Intishārāt-i Ismāʿīliyyān, 1415 AH (1994 CE).
ʿAẓīmī, Fāṭimah, and Fatāḥīzādah, Fatḥiyyah, “A Re-reading of the Coherence of Sūrat al-Mujādilah Based on Semitic Rhetoric and Michel Cuypers’ Theory of Symmetrical Composition,” Biannual Journal of Stylistic Studies of the Holy Qur’an, 7(2), pp. 116–138, 1402 SH (2023 CE).
Baḥrānī, Sayyid Hāshim, Al-Burhān fī Tafsīr al-Qur’ān (The Proof in Qur’anic Exegesis), Tehran: Bunyād-i Baʿthat, 1416 AH (1995 CE).
Blachère, Régis, Dar Āstānah-yi Qur’ān (At the Threshold of the Qur’an), trans. Maḥmūd Rāmyār, Tehran: Daftar-i Nashr wa Farhang-i Islāmī, 1378 SH (1999 CE).
Cuypers, M. The Banquet; A reading of The Fifth Sura of The Quran. Paris: Convivium Press, 2009.
Cuypers, M. The Composition of the Qur'an. London: Bloomsbury, 2015.
Cuypers, Michel, Kānūn al-Thānī: Dalīl Tadrībī li al-Taḥlīl al-Balāghī (Training Guide to Rhetorical Analysis), Cairo: Dominican Institute for Oriental Studies, 2017 CE.
Cuypers, Michel. A Practical guide for the rhetorical analysis of the Quran: The Example of Sura 69: The Inevitable. IDEO, P 80-177, 2018.
Cuypers, Michel. Semitic Rhetoric as a Key to the Question of the naẓm of the. Journal of Quranic Studies, 13(1):1-24, 2011.
Dalāyilī, Nasrīn, Ta’ammulī bar Paywand-i Āyāt dar Sūrah al-Raḥmān (A Reflection on Verse Connectivity in Sūrah al-Raḥmān), M.A. Thesis, University of Sciences of Qur’an and Ḥadīth, Marāghah: University of Marāghah, 1395 SH (2016 CE).
Farāhīdī, Khalīl bin Aḥmad, Al-ʿAyn, Qom: Intishārāt-i Hijrat, 1410 AH (1989 CE).
Farrā’, Abū Zakarīyā Yaḥyā bin Ziyād, Maʿānī al-Qur’ān (Meanings of the Qur’an), Egypt: Dār al-Miṣriyyah li al-Ta’līf wa al-Tarjamah, n.d.
Fück, J., Tārīkh Ḥarakat al-Istishrāq: al-Dirāsāt al-ʿArabiyyah wa al-Islāmiyyah fī Ūrūbbā Ḥattā Bidāyat al-Qarn al-ʿIshrīn (The History of Orientalism: Arabic and Islamic Studies in Europe until the Early 20th Century), Beirut: Dār al-Madār al-Islāmī, 1894 CE.
Hāshimzādah Harīsī, Hāshim, Farhang-i Qur’ān: Āmūzish-i Tarjamah wa Tafsīr-i Qur’ān (Qur’anic Dictionary: Teaching Translation and Interpretation), Qom: Bunyād-i ʿUlūm-i Qur’ān, 1373 SH (1994 CE).
Ḥusaynīzādah, Sayyid ʿAbd al-Rasūl, and Mīrzīnali, Sayyid Faḍlullāh, “Critical Reading of Incoherence Claims in Qur’anic Verses Based on Nöldeke’s Views,” Qur’anic Studies of Orientalists, No. 36, pp. 239–266, 1403 SH (2024 CE).
Ibn Manẓūr, Muḥammad bin Mukarram, Lisān al-‘Arab, Beirut: Dār Ṣādir, 1414 AH (1993 CE).
Jawādī Āmulī, ʿAbdullāh, Tafsīr-i Tasmīm (Tasnīm Exegesis), Qom: Intishārāt-i Isrā’, 1395 SH (2016 CE).
Jurjānī, ʿAbd al-Qāhir bin ʿAbd al-Raḥmān, Bayān Iʿjāz al-Qur’ān fī Thalāth Rasā’il fī Iʿjāz al-Qur’ān (On the Inimitability of the Qur’an in Three Treatises), Cairo: Dār al-Maʿārif, 1955 CE.
Khaṭīb, ʿAbd al-Karīm, Al-Tafsīr al-Qur’ānī li al-Qur’ān (Qur’anic Interpretation of the Qur’an), n.p.: Dār al-Fikr al-‘Arabī, 1407 AH (1987 CE).
Makāram Shīrāzī, Nāṣir, Tafsīr-i Namūnah (The Example Exegesis), Tehran: Dār al-Kutub al-Islāmiyyah, 1371 SH (1992 CE).
Mint, R., Pouzet, L., Fārūqī, N., Snow, A., Ṭarīqat al-Taḥlīl al-Balāghī wa al-Tafsīr: Taḥlīl Nuṣūṣ min al-Kitāb al-Muqaddas wa al-Ḥadīth al-Nabawī al-Sharīf (Methods of Rhetorical Analysis and Interpretation: Analyzing Texts from the Bible and the Noble Prophetic Hadith), Beirut: Dār al-Mashriq, 2004 CE.
Mir, M. The surah as Unity, in The Koran, critical concepts in Islamic studies, ed. by Colin Turner. First published. Routledge Cruzen, vol.4, P.198-209, 2004.
Mufīd, Muḥammad bin Muḥammad, Al-Ikhtiṣāṣ, Qom: World Congress for the Millennium of Shaykh al-Mufīd, 1413 AH (1992 CE).
Murād Walīd, Muḥammad, Naẓariyyat al-Naẓm wa Qīmathā al-ʿIlmiyyah fī al-Dirāsāt al-Lughawiyyah ʿinda ʿAbd al-Qāhir al-Jurjānī (The Theory of Composition and Its Scientific Value in the Linguistic Studies of ʿAbd al-Qāhir al-Jurjānī), Damascus: Dār al-Fikr, 1403 AH (1983 CE).
Mūsawī Hamadānī, Sayyid Muḥammad Bāqir, Tarjamah-yi al-Mīzān (Translation of al-Mīzān), Qom: Daftar-i Intishārāt-i Islāmī, 1374 SH (1995 CE).
Nīlsāz, Nuṣrat, Jalālī-Kandari, Sohaylā, and Nabʿī, Sājidah, “Re-reading the Coherence of Sūrat al-Ghāshiyah in Light of Semitic Rhetoric Theory (Focusing on the Studies of Michel Cuypers),” Biannual Journal of Stylistic Studies of the Holy Qur’an, 8(2), pp. 226–247, 1403 SH (2024 CE).
Pākatchī, Aḥmad, “Āfrīqā–Zabān-hā” (Africa–Languages), in The Great Islamic Encyclopedia, ed. Kāẓim Muḥammadī Bujnūrdī, Tehran: Markaz-i Dā’irat al-Maʿārif-i Buzurg-i Islāmī, Vol. 9, 1379 SH (2000 CE).
Qurṭubī, Muḥammad bin Aḥmad, Al-Jāmiʿ li Aḥkām al-Qur’ān (The Compendium of Qur’anic Rulings), Tehran: Nāṣir Khusraw, 1364 SH (1985 CE).
Rāghib Iṣfahānī, Ḥusayn bin Muḥammad, Al-Mufradāt fī Gharīb al-Qur’ān (Lexicon of Rare Qur’anic Words), Beirut: Dār al-ʿIlm, 1412 AH (1991 CE).
Rāzī, Muḥammad bin ʿUmar, Al-Tafsīr al-Kabīr (Mafātīḥ al-Ghayb) (The Great Exegesis: The Keys to the Unseen), Beirut: Dār Iḥyā’ al-Turāth al-ʿArabī, 1420 AH (1999 CE).
Reẓā’ī Haftādār, Ḥasan, “Evaluation of Qur’anic Views of Some Contemporary Orientalists,” Qur’anic Studies of Orientalists, 15(29), pp. 293–318, 1399 SH (2020 CE).
Ṣādiqī Tihrānī, Muḥammad, Al-Furqān fī Tafsīr al-Qur’ān bi al-Qur’ān wa al-Sunnah (The Criterion: Interpretation of the Qur’an through the Qur’an and Sunnah), Qom: Intishārāt-i Farhang-i Islāmī, 1365 SH (1986 CE).
Sāzjīnī, Murtazā, ʿAsharīyah, Raḥmān, and Naqīb, Sayyid Muḥammad, “A Critique of the Epistolary View of the Qur’an,” Biannual Journal of Qur’anic Studies of Orientalists, No. 31, pp. 129–154, 1400 SH (2021 CE).
Ṭabāṭabā’ī, Sayyid Muḥammad Ḥusayn, Al-Mīzān fī Tafsīr al-Qur’ān (The Balance in Qur’anic Interpretation), Beirut: Mu’assasat al-Aʿlamī, 1390 AH (1970 CE).
Ṭūsī, Muḥammad bin Ḥasan, Al-Tibyān fī Tafsīr al-Qur’ān (The Elucidation in Qur’anic Interpretation), Beirut: Dār Iḥyā’ al-Turāth al-ʿArabī, n.d.
Wansbrough, J. Quranic Studies: Sources and Methods of Scriptural Interpretation. USA, 2004. First published, 1977.
Yuslam al-Mujawwid, M., Manhaj al-Balāghah al-Sāmiyyah fī Dirāsat Bunyat al-Qur’ān al-Karīm (The Method of Semitic Rhetoric in Studying the Structure of the Noble Qur’an), Center for Qur’anic Studies, 2020 CE.
Zāriʿ Zardīnī, Aḥmad, Ṣaḥrā’ī Ardakānī, Kamāl, and Jannatī Fīrūzābādī, Ṣidīqah, “Structural Analysis of Sūrah al-Fatḥ in Light of Semitic Rhetoric with Emphasis on the Division of the Qur’an into 555 Thematic Units (Rukūʿāt),” Biannual Journal of Linguistic Researches on the Qur’an, No. 1, pp. 1–18, 1400 SH (2021 CE)
 

Files

History

  • Receive Date: 06 July 2023
  • Revise Date: 22 February 2025
  • Accept Date: 10 March 2025

Share

How to cite

Statistics