عنوان مقاله [English]
Throughout their orientalistic history, European Qur'anic researchers have tried in many ways to distort the Muslim scripture. Some of them are sowing doubts about the history of the Holy Quran, the content, the language of the Holy Qur'an, as well as the doubts to the basics and foundations of the Holy Quran. Likewise, claiming syntactic errors of the Quran is another suspicion. In fact, they are trying to undermine supposedly the form and content superiority of the Qur'an over the scriptures of the Torah and the Bible by casting doubt on the Quranic revelation, the Prophet's prophecy, the preservation of the Qur'an, and finally by denying the miracle of the Qur'an. The claim of syntactic errors in the Holy Qur'an is one of those instances that Muslim scholars have come up with precise, wise and profound answers because they themselves refer to these as "doubts" in their commentary books and reply have given.
The present paper has attempted in a descriptive and analytical manner with concise and decisive responses to reveal the hollowness of their allegations.