نوع مقاله : مقاله پژوهشی
نویسندگان
1 . استادیار گروه قرآن و مستشرقان،مجتمع آموزش عالی قرآن و حدیث، جامعة المصطفی ص العالمیة، قم، ایران
2 . دانش آموخته سطح چهار، مرکز تخصصی تفسیر و علوم قرآن، قم، ایران، «نویسنده مسئول»
چکیده
کلیدواژه‌ها
موضوعات
عنوان مقاله [English]
نویسندگان [English]
One of the significant topics in the study of exegetical schools and methods is the identification of interpretive approaches. This subject holds particular importance for exegetes and Quranic scholars, referred to in Arabic as ittijāhāt tafsīriyya and in English as Approaches to Interpretation. Various books have been written on this topic by different authors. Among these works, The Directions of Exegesis Among Muslims by Ignaz Goldziher stands out due to the importance of Orientalist studies with diverse perspectives. Examining his discussions on exegetical trends is crucial. Additionally, given the significance of narrative interpretation (tafsīr al-riwāyī) as the earliest interpretive method, Goldziher’s discussions on this topic have been critically analyzed. While some positive aspects can be identified, the quantity and quality of his errors are too substantial to overlook. This article, employing a descriptive-analytical method with a critical approach, systematically organizes and evaluates Goldziher’s views on narrative interpretation. The findings reveal that his analysis of the narrative interpretation method is unacceptable, containing numerous foundational and methodological flaws. The author argues that Goldziher’s specific intellectual inclinations, his misunderstanding of the principles of narrative interpretation, lack of precision in scholarly analysis, incorrect references, and biases have led to his errors.
کلیدواژه‌ها [English]
)